Skip to main content

Update

Online Voting Integrity Report

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

Written & published by Erick Cabal

Online voting for Mister & Miss Photogenic has closed. It reached its full capacity of 25,000 votes on July 21, 2026 at 9:27 PM, over 14 days of voting.

As part of keeping the voting transparent, we ran a full integrity check covering every vote cast. This report sets out how the voting worked, the safeguards in place, the verification results, the voting pace, and the final standing for every candidate.

These are the final figures.

How the voting worked

Voting was open to anyone with a Google account. Each account could cast one vote for Miss and one vote for Mister per day, and the daily count reset at midnight, Manila time.

That limit was enforced by the database itself rather than by the browser, so it was unaffected by clearing cookies, using a private window, switching browsers, or using another device. The account was the ballot.

Voting ran until the phase capacity of 25,000 total votes was reached, counting Miss and Mister together. That capacity was reached on July 21, 2026 at 9:27 PM, ahead of the August 22 deadline.

What we verified

We reviewed every vote record in the database, including the timestamp, the voting account, the originating network, and the device signature.

The review covered duplicate accounts, irregular timing intervals, disposable email addresses, single-use accounts, and the concentration of votes on individual networks.

Verification results

The complete integrity figures for the full campaign.

Every vote counted came from a separately verified account.

MeasureResult
Total votes counted25,000
Capacity for this phase25,000 (reached)
Voting openedJuly 8, 2026, 8:09 PM
Voting closedJuly 21, 2026, 9:27 PM
Days of voting14 (July 8 to July 21)
Distinct voter accounts9,737
Distinct networks6,921
Duplicate votes recorded0
Networks with 5 or more accounts487
Largest single network206 accounts
Average votes per candidate per day44.6

Voting pace

Vote timing was reviewed second by second, because automated voting leaves a distinctive signature: large numbers of votes landing in the same instant, from very few sources.

The busiest single second of the entire campaign carried four votes, and the busiest single minute carried twenty-nine. Of the 24,403 seconds in which any vote was cast, only 573 carried more than one vote. The overall pace averaged about one vote every 45 seconds.

Participation rose steadily through the campaign and peaked on the final day, when 4,653 votes were cast, or 18.6 percent of the entire campaign, averaging 116 votes per candidate. The closing stretch was spread across 593 networks and 1,302 accounts, with no single network accounting for more than about four percent of it.

The busiest second of the entire campaign carried four votes.

DayVotesAverage per candidate
July 890.2
July 91,12528.1
July 101,56439.1
July 111,00425.1
July 121,01425.4
July 131,47736.9
July 141,43335.8
July 151,81245.3
July 162,16654.1
July 171,89047.2
July 181,49137.3
July 192,41860.5
July 202,94473.6
July 214,653116.3

A note on shared networks

The records show many accounts voting from the same network addresses. This is expected in the Philippines and is not treated as irregular.

Mobile data providers place large numbers of subscribers behind a single shared address, and a school, office, internet shop, or household typically shares one connection among many users. Restricting shared connections would block genuine voters in large numbers, so the system is designed to allow them.

A per-network daily ceiling is nevertheless in place, so that no single connection can dominate the count.

Final results, Miss

All 18 Miss candidates, final count. Switch between the overall totals, the week-by-week detail where each day shows the votes, the networks they came from and the device split, and the device summary.

No.CandidateVotesShareAvg / dayJul 21
10Daniela O. De Luna2,80019.2%200.01,068
18Aryanna D. Delfin2,41016.5%172.1776
03Maan Joyce Puspos Saclolo1,88312.9%134.5557
12Hanna Maureen B. Aquino1,49910.3%107.1257
01Gwyneth Monica Aranda1,2078.3%86.2222
14Aeriele Nicole Ribon9856.7%70.458
07Geraldine Zarah M. Olaco7735.3%55.252
11Rochelle Dea Bilon5403.7%38.649
02Pneuma Faith Morilla5263.6%37.627
13Shiela Vecina3872.7%27.612
19Mairoden M. Guevarra3772.6%26.92
16Krystel Profeta3432.3%24.538
20Aira Adjal2351.6%16.89
17Joji Canicosa2221.5%15.931
08Jesselee-Anne G. Fialde1941.3%13.926
05Mylene Romero850.6%6.14
15Stephany Faith Gillego820.6%5.93
09Jenilie Kristine De Belen550.4%3.92

All 18 Miss candidates, final count. Total Miss votes: 14,603. The average is that candidate's own daily average across the 14 days of voting.

Final results, Mister

All 22 Mister candidates, final count. Switch between the overall totals, the week-by-week detail where each day shows the votes, the networks they came from and the device split, and the device summary.

No.CandidateVotesShareAvg / dayJul 21
01Mark Aiken Bayaya2,50324.1%178.8724
11Justine Rushell Geronimo Caimol2,23521.5%159.6375
06John Rio Ezekiel V. Garcia1,33512.8%95.4205
02Jopher Mendoza Almanzor8678.3%61.912
13Russel Nash R. Grulla6556.3%46.819
17Ramuel Angelo D. Mondijar3873.7%27.622
22Reymark A. Icatlo3613.5%25.813
20John Ric Dinio3253.1%23.210
21Arkin Dela Cruz3123.0%22.316
04Christian Paycana2472.4%17.67
14Artchie Turla2292.2%16.421
09Mark Joseph Cruz1731.7%12.42
05Ace Anderson Angeles1551.5%11.12
18Louiesse Garciano1481.4%10.65
16Jhayr Garcia1281.2%9.10
03Clouie O. Bernal850.8%6.12
15Mark Lloyd Quijardo720.7%5.16
19Mark Joseph Vidal690.7%4.96
08Alexander Sareli Labampa470.5%3.40
12Christian Vasquez240.2%1.72
10John Paul Juanillo230.2%1.69
07Niño Baliza170.2%1.22

All 22 Mister candidates, final count. Total Mister votes: 10,397. The average is that candidate's own daily average across the 14 days of voting.

Summary

All 25,000 votes recorded passed verification. Every account that cast a vote was a separately verified Google account, and no duplicate votes were recorded across the entire campaign.

The second-by-second timing shows no sign of automated voting, and the closing stretch was widely distributed across networks and accounts rather than concentrated in a few.

As a control, the standings were recalculated a second time while setting aside the most concentrated voting patterns. The resulting order at the top was unchanged.

The safeguards performed as designed, and the final standings reflect participation exactly as recorded.

What happens next

Voting for this phase is now closed, having reached its full capacity of 25,000 votes on July 21, 2026 at 9:27 PM.

The figures in this report are final. Results will be recognised as part of the Mister & Miss Photogenic award.

Thank you to everyone who took part, and to every supporter who showed up for their candidate.